TL;DR

Warning: This is a brevity-free zone

3 notes

Unexcited? There May Be a Pill for That

greenchestnuts:

This is eight pages long but I found it a very interesting read, and more nuanced than I expected. They quote Dr. Lori Brotto, who’s also done a lot of asexuality research.

Also, it took me several pages to realize that the photos were orgasm faces. I thought the women were just making weird faces for the heck of it.

For the record, this one came up in journal club today. Transcript will go up Monday. 

I, also, did not initially realize they were orgasm faces until the second page! Mostly I was too busy being creeped out by the pills themselves. 

1 note

I’ve heard similar sentiments from a whole bunch of people now. How disappointing. :(

Yeaaah, a few people tried to warn me but I didn’t listen because I wanted to read the fic after seeing the movie. Just… don’t waste your money. The actors appear to have done their best with what they had but the writing is appalling, the lens-flare/shaky-camera stuff is even more egregious than last movie, and the pacing was a hot mess. There were also several moments of serious narm. 

Also, the whole racefail thing. Having Cumberbatch—arguably the most fishbelly white dude I have ever seen—play the role of a guy named Khan was utterly, surreally stupid. I mean, it would have been bad even if he hadn’t been whitewashing the character, it was just daft. 

55 notes

It Turns Out Asexual People Have Problems, Too

I wrote a post for the Asexual Agenda last night! Go check it out. 

Also, as a note, the Agenda is still looking for contributors and guest posts! If you’re interested, please email asexualagenda [at] gmail.com! 

Filed under asexuality asexual actuallyasexual

40 notes

Can we please stop saying “non-monosexual”

angrybisexual:

anthean:

writingfromfactorx:

angrybisexual:

…unless we also mean asexuals.

There already is an umbrella term, widely used for some time now, which most people understand in a similar way… “bisexuals”.

Is this a thing? I mean, as an asexual I had always assumed I was included when people said “non-monosexual,” and a lot of what I see people talk about when they discuss monosexism is pretty applicable to us, too. Is that generally elided in bisexual/pansexual centered spaces? 

(Honest question. I’ve been debating writing something about comparing asexuality to bisexuality for a bit, but before I do I’d want to think more about how the two communities interact with one another.) 

Huh, and I had always assumed I was not included when people said “non-monosexual”. Put me down as another person who’s curious about this.

Well, technically non-monosexual includes aces, but in practice the term is often used to mean bisexuals in the broad sense, since pansexuals often insist that they have a separate sexuality (a difference I don’t really see…). That is why I think bisexuals shouldn’t use the term unless we actually mean all non-monosexuals, so we don’t participate in ace-erasure.

Thanks for the clarification! Unfortunately, that sounds pretty much par for the course when sexual orientation gets discussed in non-specifically-asexual spaces—if we’re lucky we get a bit of lip service, but then the conversation continues apace as if we don’t exist again. 

40 notes

Can we please stop saying “non-monosexual”

angrybisexual:

…unless we also mean asexuals.

There already is an umbrella term, widely used for some time now, which most people understand in a similar way… “bisexuals”.

Is this a thing? I mean, as an asexual I had always assumed I was included when people said “non-monosexual,” and a lot of what I see people talk about when they discuss monosexism is pretty applicable to us, too. Is that generally elided in bisexual/pansexual centered spaces? 

(Honest question. I’ve been debating writing something about comparing asexuality to bisexuality for a bit, but before I do I’d want to think more about how the two communities interact with one another.) 

51 notes

I like that ‘Harry Potter facts’ post well enough

raggedybearcat:

with the exception of

Ron’s Patronus is a Jack Russel Terrier, which are know for chasing otters. Hermione’s Patronus happens to be an otter.

Jack Russell Terriers chase EVERY SINGLE THING IN EXISTENCE including hares, swans, cats, probably wild boars and stags and wolves I can’t remember other patronuses but I’m sure JRTs would chase them.  They were designed to chase foxes, and they’ve probably been used in otter hunting but that’s not their purpose.  THEY ARE TOO BRAVE TO BE SENSIBLE.  IT’S PROBABLY A GRYFFINDOR METAPHOR IF ANYTHING.  Them chasing otters is the stupidest connection you can draw.

I swear to god this is the Toothed Pteranodon Toy of my time here on Tumblr, a petty insignificant thing that fills me with so much rage while no one else gives a crap because it is so petty and insignificant.

I had a Jack Russell Terrier who attempted to eat a deer when I was young, so I can confirm the stags thing! They are pretty sure that they are really about three hundred pounds apiece, and also entirely invincible. 

234 notes

The asexual community is a terrible place to hide from your sexuality

anthean:

ace-muslim:

queenieofaces:

This post has been cross-posted to The Asexual Agenda.

A while back there was this big kerfuffle on tumblr* about how aces are secretly harmful to LGB folks.  One of the main arguments was that LGB folks have internalized heterosexism, and thus use the asexual community to hide from their sexuality.  Now, I’m not really interested in getting into the whole “are aces harmful to LGB folks” debate, because that thing is a can of worms—a can of flesh-eating, fire-breathing, radioactive worms, that is.  But the idea of hiding from one’s sexuality in the ace community had me raising my eyebrows so far that they were practically flying off my face, and all I could think was, Have you ever spent any time in the ace community?  If I wanted to hide from my sexuality, the asexual community is the last place I’d go.  Here’s why:

Read More

This is very much on point!

excellent post!

(didn’t there used to be a joke about how the first thing anyone did after coming out as asexual was develop their own model of sexuality?)

Were there sketches of the ‘i’m on a boat’ model? I think I remember sketches. 

32 notes

Queer in STEM: A national survey of sexual diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

greenchestnuts:

In the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), the social experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, or queer (LGBTQ) professionals are often overlooked. Those of us who work in STEM research or teaching know that LGBTQ colleagues are out there, if we know where to look, but we know very little about the LGBTQ folks who work in STEM, as a group. Basic, general information regrading the following questions is hard to come by:

What do we study?
What kinds of institutions do we work at?
What kinds of communities do we live in?
What degree of acceptance and support have we found in our chosen career fields?


We’re Jeremy Yoder, a Postdoctoral Associate in the Department of Plant Biology at the University of Minnesota; and Allison Mattheis, who just accepted a faculty position in the College of Education at California State University Los Angeles. As queer academics, we’re interested in understanding and improving the climate for LGBTQ faculty, staff, and graduate students in the sciences. This led us to the idea of developing and conducting a systematic, nationwide survey of LGBTQ folks in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), asking basic questions to identify who we are, what fields we work in, how our careers compare to those of our straight peers, and how our identities interact with our chosen work.

To begin to answer those questions, we’ve initiated this online survey of LGBTQ folks working in STEM. If you’re queer, have completed at least a bachelor’s or technical degree, and are working in STEM in any capacity — grad school, the tenure track, corporate R&D, the nonprofit sector, or science communication — we want to hear from you, and we need your help to collect a comprehensive sample.

You can take the survey and learn how to help spread the word right here. Thanks in advance!

In addition to the lesbian, bisexual, gay, trans*, and queer/questioning populations, they’re looking for responses from undecided, intersex, asexual, and genderqueer people, “and more.” So it sounds like they’re trying to survey a pretty broad group. It is limited to Americans, unfortunately.

If you aren’t in their target population, please signal boost to help them reach more people!

(Found via The Asexual Agenda.)